Only recently, a friend bought a house in Lagos. Few weeks after he had made full payments and accepted from the seller just the documents that the seller chose to give him, he called to ask me whether it was wise of him to have accepted A DEED OF SUBLEASE. In his words, “I have bought a house, the seller has given me a Deed of Sub-Lease, but when I bought a land some years earlier what I got was a Deed of Assignment. I hope my interest is well protected? Well, we hope so, but maybe not.
It really depends on the nature of the title or interest the seller has or the scheme you bought from. As you already know the seller can only give what he has.. Other times, it could just be that the seller is simply being “prudent”. Any good lawyer who is familiar with real estate transactions can explain the difference between these two key documents (A DEED OF SUB-LEASE & A DEED OF ASSIGNMENT) , because indeed there is a DIFFERENCE that you ought to know before you buy. And don’t behave like that friend who came only after he had paid the seller.
Let me explain. A Deed of Assignment gives you ALL THAT THE SELLER HAS on the land or house. The buyer becomes the FULL OWNER, subject only to the provisions of the Land Use Act. However, a Deed of Lease [Sub-Lease] is some form of LONG RENT OR LEASE, as the title eventually reverts to the Seller [the Lessor]. An assignment (Latin, cessio) is a term used with similar meanings in the law of contracts and in the law of real estate. In both instances, it encompasses the transfer of all the rights held by one party—the assignor—to another party—the assignee.